Altra Superior 2.0; A Good Shoe Becomes a GREAT shoe!

2014 seemed to be the year for Altra to radically update many of their shoe lines.

This is the Superior’s update to the 2.0.Altra Superior 2.0

My first impressions:  Out of the box the first thing I noticed was the laces are different, they are a softer feel and they stay tied!  The colors were the next thing.  It come in grey/purple or yellow/blue for women and grey/green or a darker blue/yellow for the men.  I ordered the yellow/blue and really think they look good.  Not so bright that they are obnoxious, but colorful enough that they get noticed! They felt really good on my feet walking around the house, cushioned yet still firm,  and a really nice updated tread on the bottom.

Lucky me, it was rainy and muddy and cold this morning-perfect for putting a new shoe through its paces.   I ran the 1/4 mile down my street to the trailhead and sloshed my way down the trail to meet a friend.  They were solid in the mud, no slipping backwards up hills on the slick wet leaves, and were protective over rocky sections of the trail.  I ran 13 miles in them, 10 on the trails and 3 back home on roads.  They were comfortable on and off of the trails, not bumpy like some trail shoe tread can be on road.   They felt good, fast, flexible and protective.  I didn’t even notice that I had run in them with out the stone guard in them until I got home and looked in the box again and saw the stone guards sitting at the bottom of the box.  They are also fitted with Altra’s cool gaiter trap on the back of the heel now as well.

The Technical Stuff:

Zero drop, like all Altra shoes have

Weight: Men 8.7oz, Women 7.5 oz (Lighter than the Superior 1.5’s 9.9 oz and 8.8oz respectively)

Stack height: 21mm (which is very close to the Lone Peak 1.5’s 22mm, but is higher than the Superior 1.5’s 18mm)

Upper: Trail Mesh with minimal seems.  After my long wet run they seemed to dry out faster than the Lone Peak 1.5s used to.

Outsole:  Features canted lugs below the metatarsals for better gripping, their signature sticky rubber TrailClaw, and still has the happy little foot shape on the bottom.

Overall thoughts:  Altra has been doing a lot of growing and updating in the last year while still maintaining their roomy toe boxes, zero drop, and good quality.  The Superior 2.0 seems to be taking the place of the discontinued Lone Peak 1.5s.   While the Lone Peak 2.0 was updated further with more stack height and cushion, this means the Superior 2.0 will fit nicely into that place of lower stack height, more trail feel, but with enough protection and better tread than the Superior 1.5 or the Lone Peak 1.5.  You can also make them lighter and more flexible by taking out the rock plate.  This makes me happy because the Lone Peak 1.5s have been my ultra go to shoe for the last year, the Superior 2.0 will be my new go to shoe for trail ultras now, I can already tell.  So if you loved the Lone Peak 1.5, or even the Superior 1.5 I really think this is your shoe.  If you are looking for fast, responsive, flexible, but protective this is also your shoe.   In the land of max cushioning shoes, this is definitely bucking the trend giving your feet that trail feel that they have missed so much.  I can’t say enough good things about this shoe update, well done ALTRA!

Post Script: Many people are finding that sizing up 1/5 a size from the Superior 1.5 to the 2.0 feels best.

UPDATE:  I took them on a true tread test just yesterday on a very rainy, very leaf covered trail.  Uwharrie National Forest 20 miler.  This is my standard test run to see how my winter fitness is for early 2015 races.  I have run this the second week of Dec for the last 3 years, its a relenting rocky, rooty, slippery, wet undulating trail with no real runnable sections.  Its one of those trails that you can’t take your eyes or mind off of for a second or you will twist an ankle or slip on a rock.  I ran it 3 weeks ago in the old Lone Peak 1.5’s before the aggressive tread update, and I slipped a lot.  I was expecting something similar this week, I have run this course at least 10 times and have tried out many different types of shoes on the terrain.  I was so happy with the Superior 2.0’s tread and grip, I just kept repeating to my friend over and over, “these shoes just stick so well, they are so grippy, they are so comfortable too….I am SO happy!”  This will definitely be a shoe that I spend a lot of miles in! (I have already spent 500+ miles in them, yay!)

Advertisements

8 responses to “Altra Superior 2.0; A Good Shoe Becomes a GREAT shoe!

  1. Nice review. One question. What is a more accurate colors, your photos of the product image?

    • Ed, good question. I realize all our screens change the colors a bit. Both of the pictures shown are of the women’s shoe. I would say looking at my computer and comparing my shoe next to me with the screen my pictures are more accurate. Its more of orangy than yellow..but more yellow than the Orange that was on the Lone Peak 1.5 (for women also.) The product is much brighter and more yellow than the actual shoe.

  2. This is the review I’ve been looking for! I have the Superior 1.5 and Lone Peak 1.5- I love the fit of the Superior, but I don’t think it has enough traction in mud, and not quite enough protection underfoot, but the Lone Peak is great for that. My only wish with the Lone Peak is that it would be slightly lighter, so it looks like the Superior 2.0 is going to fit the bill perfectly.

    • So glad this was helpful for you Erin! I have put about 300 miles on them now in lots of really slippery mud and am still just as pleased with them as I was when I first reviewed them! Many people find that they need to size up 1/2 size from their LP 1/5s

  3. I’ve been looking for reviews for the Superior 2.0 for a little while now, and most have been positive. Any shoe that can survive Uwharrie is good enough for me to test out. Thanks!

  4. Thanks for the review. I’m about to buy a Superior 2.0, but not sure about the sizing. I’m running in a Lone Peak 1.5 US 10 (men), with stability wedge – and its a perfect fit. Do you think 10.5 would be enough for Superior 2.0?

    • I think the 10.5 would be big enough. I have a few (male) friends that went up a 1/2 size, but others that went up a full size. It depends on how much your forefoot splays. I didn’t size up in the women’s shoe from the LP 1.5 to the Superior 2.0, but I have a female friend that went up a .5 size. If you go to Altra’s website they have a tool that will recommend what size you should wear from one shoe to the next (It will show you how it fits in the front, middle and rear of the shoe compared to the LP 1.5) Its a really cool tool, right above the red “add to cart box” it says “show me how it fits.” http://www.altrarunning.com/fitness/en/Altra/mens-shoes/superior-20-mens

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s